Is film really the only form of art that can be duplicated without lossing its authentcity because one can experience this form in both time and space? Can't a duplicate of a painting do the same?
Does this article really apply to our modern day way of thinking? For example I don't know if I agree with the quote, "The uniquiness of a work of art is inseparable from its being imbedded in the fabric of tradition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment